1. What counts as a fixed term contract
  2. Who is involved in the scheme
  3. The three limits that apply to fixed term contracts
    1. The two-year cap
    2. One renewal only
    3. Consecutive contracts
  4. When the limits do not apply
  5. The information statement you must give
  6. What happens when a contract breaches the limits
  7. How a fixed term engagement ends
  8. Common pitfalls in practice
  9. When to get legal help
  10. The end date is not a guarantee

A fixed term contract is the employment arrangement you use when a role has a genuine end point: a set date, the completion of a project, or the end of a season. It lets you hire someone to cover parental leave, a funding cycle or a seasonal peak without taking on a permanent headcount. The employment relationship is built to finish, and when it reaches the agreed end date it comes to an end without either party having to go through a termination in the usual sense.

Since 6 December 2023, though, fixed term hiring has been governed by a set of statutory limits in Division 5 of Part 2-9 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act). The headline rules are that a fixed term contract generally cannot run for more than two years, cannot be renewed more than once, and cannot be rolled into consecutive contracts for substantially the same work. Get the structure wrong and the end date in the contract can stop having any effect at all, which means the employee keeps working past it as though the role were ongoing. This guide explains how the regime operates, who is involved, when the limits apply, the exceptions that let you go further, and how to manage endings cleanly.

What counts as a fixed term contract

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) describes a fixed term employee as someone employed on a contract that terminates at the end of a set period. That covers a contract ending on a set date, after a set period of time, or at the end of a season, and the FW Act adds that it also includes a contract for a specified task. For the purposes of the limits, the statutory definition is deliberately broad: it captures any contract that includes a term providing that the contract will terminate at the end of an identifiable period, "whether or not the contract also includes other terms that provide for circumstances in which it may be terminated before the end of that period" (s 333E(1)(b)).

That last point matters more than it looks. A maximum-term contract, which adds a right for either side to end the relationship earlier on notice, is often described as a more flexible cousin of the fixed term contract. But the FW Act's definition is wide enough to catch it. The two-year cap and the single-renewal limit still need to be checked for any contract with an identifiable end period, whatever you call it in the letter of offer. Adding an early-termination clause buys you flexibility about how the engagement ends; it does not buy you an exemption from the limits.

A fixed term employee can be full-time or part-time, and the arrangement does not change the core entitlements that apply. The FWO's guidance confirms that fixed term employees are generally entitled to the same wages, penalty rates and leave as permanent employees, and the National Employment Standards, any applicable modern award and any enterprise agreement continue to apply in the usual way.

Who is involved in the scheme

Several players sit behind the fixed term rules, and it helps to know what each one does:

  • The employer: decides whether a fixed term is genuinely appropriate, drafts the contract, gives the information statement at commencement, and carries the risk if the limits are breached.
  • The employee: has the right to the Fixed Term Contract Information Statement, keeps the same minimum entitlements as ongoing staff, and can challenge a contract that breaches the limits.
  • The Fair Work Ombudsman: publishes the Fixed Term Contract Information Statement, investigates breaches, and can start court proceedings under its compliance and enforcement powers.
  • The Fair Work Commission: hears disputes about whether the limits or the exceptions apply when the matter cannot be resolved at the workplace level.
  • The courts: can impose civil penalties for contraventions, and employees can use the small claims procedure for certain fixed term disputes.

The practical point for a business is that compliance is not policed by a single regulator alone. An employee who suspects the limits were breached can take the dispute to the Fair Work Commission or to a court, so getting the structure right up front matters.

The three limits that apply to fixed term contracts

For contracts entered into on or after 6 December 2023, s 333E of the FW Act prohibits three things unless an exception applies. The limits do not apply to casual employees engaged for a shift or to contracts entered into before that date, although pre-6 December 2023 contracts still count when working out whether a new contract breaches the consecutive contract limit.

The two-year cap

A fixed term contract cannot be for more than two years. The cap also looks forward: the identifiable period plus any other period for which the contract may be extended or renewed cannot total more than two years (s 333E(2) and (3)(a)). A three-year contract breaches the limit outright, and so does a two-year contract with an option to extend for another six months.

One renewal only

The contract cannot provide for an option or right to extend or renew more than once (s 333E(3)(b)). Even a short contract with two renewal options is caught, because the limit is on the number of renewal rights, not just on the total length.

Consecutive contracts

An employee cannot be offered a new fixed term contract where the previous contract was also fixed term, the work is the same or substantially similar, there is substantial continuity in the employment relationship, and any of these applies: the combined periods of the previous and new contract exceed two years, the new contract contains an option for renewal or extension, the previous contract's extension option was exercised, or there was an earlier fixed term contract for the same work with continuity before the previous contract (s 333E(4) and (5)).

This is the rule that catches businesses rolling a contractor-style or project employee from one fixed term contract to the next for years. The history matters, not just the current document.

When the limits do not apply

Section 333F sets out the exceptions, and the FWO publishes guidance on each. A contract is outside the limits where:

  • A distinct identifiable task: the employee performs only a distinct and identifiable task requiring specialised skills, such as a technology professional engaged for a particular project.
  • A training arrangement: the employee is engaged under a formal apprenticeship or traineeship made under state or territory law.
  • Peak demand: the employee performs essential work during a peak demand period, such as a ski patroller hired for the season.
  • Emergency or cover: the employee works in emergency circumstances or covers the temporary absence of another employee, such as a parental leave replacement.
  • High income: the employee's earnings under the contract exceed the high income threshold for the year the contract is entered into, calculated pro rata for part-time or part-year work. The threshold is $190,100 from 1 July 2026 and changes each year.
  • Government funding: the position is funded in whole or part by government funding paid for more than two years with no reasonable prospect of renewal after that period.
  • Governance positions: the contract relates to a governance position that has a time limit under the governing rules of a corporation or association.
  • Award permission: a modern award covering the employee includes terms that permit the otherwise-limited circumstance, for example fixed term research contracts in some academic awards.
  • Sector-specific additions: additional exceptions apply in organised sport, high performance sport, charities and not-for-profits, and medical or health research.

Two cautions apply here. First, an employer who relies on an exception bears the evidential burden if proceedings are brought, so the reason for the exception should be documented at the time of hiring. Second, whether an exception applies is intensely fact-specific. A contract "for a project" is only exempt if the project is a distinct identifiable task requiring specialised skills, not a label applied to ordinary business-as-usual work.

The information statement you must give

An employer who enters a fixed term contract must give the employee a copy of the Fixed Term Contract Information Statement before, or as soon as practicable after, the contract is entered into (s 333K of the FW Act). The statement explains the rules about when fixed term contracts are allowed to be made, and a new version was published in November 2025 following changes to the additional exceptions. It is a separate document from the Fair Work Information Statement that every new employee must receive, so a fixed term hire on or after 6 December 2023 usually needs both. Failing to give the statement is itself a contravention of a civil remedy provision.

What happens when a contract breaches the limits

The most serious consequence is structural rather than financial. Under s 333G of the FW Act, if a contract is entered into in contravention of the limits, the term providing for the end date is taken to have no effect, while the rest of the contract remains valid. The contract simply does not come to an end at the stated date, and the employment continues as though it were ongoing. An employer who assumed the end date would finish the relationship can find the employee still on the books months later, with all the usual obligations attached.

On top of that, contravening s 333E is a civil remedy provision carrying up to 60 penalty units, or 600 penalty units for a serious contravention (s 539 of the FW Act). The FWO can start court proceedings for alleged breaches, and an employee can bring a small claims application in connection with a dispute about whether the limits were breached or whether the end date still applies (s 548). The Fair Work Commission can also deal with disputes about the operation of the Division, including whether an exception applies.

The Act also contains an anti-avoidance rule. An employer must not terminate an employee for a period, delay re-engaging them, engage someone else to perform the same or substantially similar work, change the nature of the work, or otherwise alter the relationship in order to avoid the limits (s 333H). Those kinds of actions can also amount to adverse action under the general protections in Part 3-1 of the Act, which protect employees exercising workplace rights.

How a fixed term engagement ends

Planning the ending is as important as planning the start. How the engagement ends matters for notice, redundancy and unfair dismissal rights:

  • Expiry at the end date: where a genuine fixed term contract runs to its end date, the FWO's guidance is that the employee generally does not receive notice of termination or redundancy pay. Under s 386(2)(a) of the FW Act, the employee is not treated as dismissed when a specified-period contract ends at the end of the period, which means an unfair dismissal application is usually not available. There is an important carve-out: that exclusion does not apply if a substantial purpose of using the fixed term was to avoid the employer's unfair dismissal obligations (s 386(3)).
  • Early termination: a fixed term contract can only be ended early if the contract provides for it, on the grounds it specifies and with the notice it requires, and any award consultation obligations still apply.
  • Redundancy: ending a genuine fixed term at the agreed date is not a redundancy. Ending a contract early, by contrast, can raise redundancy or breach of contract issues depending on the facts.

General protections continue to apply throughout a fixed term engagement, so actions taken because of an employee's workplace rights, including rights under the fixed term provisions, can still be challenged.

Common pitfalls in practice

The failures that show up most often in practice are variations on a few themes:

  • Using a fixed term for an ongoing role: If the work does not genuinely end, rolling fixed terms is the highest-risk structure available, because the consecutive contract limit and the anti-avoidance rule both point at it.
  • Assuming maximum-term means exempt: As noted above, the statutory definition catches contracts with an identifiable end period even where early termination on notice is allowed.
  • Forgetting the information statement: The Fixed Term Contract Information Statement is a distinct document, easily missed in onboarding, and failure is a contravention.
  • Ignoring award obligations: A fixed term label does not change award coverage, classification, rates, penalties or consultation duties.
  • Not tracking contract history: Contracts entered into before 6 December 2023 count toward the consecutive contract limits for new contracts, so a file note going back several years is needed before offering a new fixed term.
  • Treating contractors as fixed term employees, or the reverse: Fixed term employees are employees: they get the National Employment Standards and award entitlements. A genuine independent contractor is a different relationship entirely, and misclassifying an employee as a contractor carries separate underpayment, superannuation and penalty exposure.

A lawyer's value in this area is concentrated at three points. First, before the hire: assessing whether the role is genuinely time-limited, whether one of the exceptions is safely available, and whether the proposed term, renewal options and prior contract history stay inside the limits. Second, at drafting: building a contract whose term, early termination, notice and renewal clauses match the structure you actually want, including the high income threshold calculations for part-time roles. Third, when something has gone wrong: responding to a dispute about whether the limits applied, negotiating where a contract's end date has lost its effect, or defending FWO or court proceedings. A short consultation up front is usually far cheaper than unpicking a contract whose end date has stopped working.

The end date is not a guarantee

If there is one thing to take from this area of law, it is that the end date in a fixed term contract is no longer a reliable exit. The reforms were designed so that a prohibited contract simply does not end when the date arrives: the end date term loses its effect, the employee keeps working, and the employer keeps paying. That makes the questions to ask before every fixed term hire very concrete. Is this role genuinely time-limited, or is it business as usual? And does the whole arrangement, including any prior contracts and any renewal options, stay within two years and one renewal? Answer those two questions honestly, document the reasoning, and put the end date in the calendar well ahead of time, and the fixed term structure still does exactly what it was designed to do.